Appendix 3A – Weblog article peer review form
Weblog Article Peer Review Form A – First Review
Writer’s Name Rik Groenland
Assessor’s name Simone van Riet
Date 24-09-2007
Rating Scale: 1 = Yes 2 = Somewhat 3 = No
Rate the article by giving a 1, 2 or 3 for each question. Read the article once to get
a general idea of what it is about, then read it a second time to rate it.
1. Is the topic interesting? 1
2. Is the title original and appropriate? 2
3. Is the introduction complete? 1
4. Is the body of the article complete? 1
5. Is the conclusion well-developed? 2
6. Is the article well-organized overall? 1
7. Is the article easy to understand? 1
8. Is the article interesting to read? 1
9. Has the writer plagiarised material? 3
Finally, read the article a third time and check it for spelling, grammar and
punctuation. Mark any corrections on the article itself then complete the rest of
the form.
Name three things you like about the article.
- The introduction of the subject by giving an example.
- The sentence “… woke up and smelled the coffee” (English expression)
- That you start with how it began and later bout how it is now.
Name three things the writer should improve.
- You give an example, but maybe you need to tell more about the subject itself.
- You can’t tell new things in the conclusion.
- Maybe you can use headings.
What is the gist of the article?
The rise of in-game advertising and how companies spend lots of money to use ut and battle against opponents
Do you think this article is good enough to pass the course? Explain your answer.
I like the article because it is very easy to read, and understand. The structure of this article is very proffessional and I think it’s good enough to pass.
