Appendix 3A – Weblog article peer review form
Weblog Article Peer Review Form A – First Review
Writer’s Name: Rik Groenland
Assessor’s name: Fleur van Ijperen
Date: 20-09-2007
Rating Scale: 1 = Yes 2 = Somewhat 3 = No
Rate the article by giving a 1, 2 or 3 for each question. Read the article once to get
a general idea of what it is about, then read it a second time to rate it.
1. Is the topic interesting? 1____
2. Is the title original and appropriate? 1____
3. Is the introduction complete? 1____
4. Is the body of the article complete? 1____
5. Is the conclusion well-developed? 1____
6. Is the article well-organized overall? 1____
7. Is the article easy to understand? 1____
8. Is the article interesting to read? 1____
9. Has the writer plagiarised material? 3____
Finally, read the article a third time and check it for spelling, grammar and
punctuation. Mark any corrections on the article itself then complete the rest of
the form.
Name three things you like about the article.
It’s easy to read.
I’ve leaned things about in game advertising I didn’t know before.
Name three things the writer should improve.
Spelling.
What is the gist of the article?
In game advertising is an upcoming marketing tool.
Do you think this article is good enough to pass the course? Explain your answer.
If Rik corrects the spelling mistakes, its good enough!!
